tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27612105.post5112915994295201717..comments2024-01-11T02:23:42.118-08:00Comments on Keepin' It Real, Yo: The Accountant is in the Detailspiker62http://www.blogger.com/profile/10976799832683250524noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27612105.post-68003334954111577502009-12-09T18:30:31.659-08:002009-12-09T18:30:31.659-08:00Or the way the DNC has those 'fact-checkers...Or the way the DNC has those 'fact-checkers', either, right?<br /><br />11 'fact-checkers' they used for Palin's book?<br /><br />12 'dumpster-divers' they sent to Alaska, after she was named to the (R) ticket?<br /><br />Who did they send to 'check' Al GoreAcle's books?<br /><br />Who did they send to 'check' BO's book?<br /><br />Who did they send to 'check' ACORN?<br /><br />Hypocrite.The Village is looking for younoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27612105.post-64300709734758061862009-12-08T20:38:58.897-08:002009-12-08T20:38:58.897-08:00If only I knew who you were, Irony! I would compli...If only I knew who you were, Irony! I would compliment you on the catch! <br /><br />You're absolutely right, the graph leaves 4 percent of the taxpayers unaccounted for. While we're at it, it doesn't specify if the "taxpayers" are individuals or corporations, which enjoy the legal status of a person. I wonder what would happen to the graph if they used that hyper-rich 4%.<br /><br />In my defense, I don't have a team of highly-paid fact checkers vetting what goes out from here, the way that Fox News does.piker62https://www.blogger.com/profile/10976799832683250524noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27612105.post-71716599742476986162009-12-08T20:30:31.293-08:002009-12-08T20:30:31.293-08:00I think it's funny that you have a post on Fox...I think it's funny that you have a post on Fox News having errant math below this post featuring your.. errant math.<br /><br />Does the graph show 95% and 5%, or something else?Ironynoreply@blogger.com